Skip to main content

Dangers of using the ":latest" tag in Docker images

Trevor Blackman
Trevor Blackman

As a software engineer and DevOps practitioner, I've lived through my fair share of late-night production issues. One of the most frustrating incidents I ever dealt with can be traced back to a simple but dangerous habit: using the :latest tag in Docker images.

A story of "it worked fine… until it didn’t"​

For over a year, everything was running smoothly. Our services were deployed regularly, infrastructure was automated, and we never gave much thought to the fact that our Dockerfiles often pointed to images like node:latest, redis:latest, and even our own internal project images built with latest. Our deployments were simple and reliable.

Then, one day, a small deployment update spun up new containers. Nothing major in the codebase had changed, so expectations were for a quick rollout. Instead, what we got was broken builds and failing services. Tracking down the issue took far longer than it should have. Eventually, we discovered the culprit: some of the :latest images had quietly pulled in new major versions of underlying software. APIs changed, defaults were different, and behavior no longer matched what our application code expected. What had worked perfectly yesterday was now catastrophically broken.

It ended up taking days to regression-test, patch, and adapt our code to match the new version of the software. And all of this pain stemmed from a tag that seems so harmless: :latest.

What does :latest actually mean?​

In Docker, every image has a tag. The :latest tag is not special in the sense of "most recent stable version"—it is simply a conventional default pointing to the image the publisher considers current.

Pulling an image with :latest means: give me whatever they’ve decided is :latest today. That could be a minor patch, or it could be a breaking major upgrade. You have no guarantees.

If you build and deploy frequently, you may sometimes lock in an image implicitly (because an image is cached locally). But as soon as Docker decides to pull again—or you build on a new CI machine—you might suddenly be running software that behaves differently than yesterday.

Why breaking changes are dangerous​

Most modern software follows semantic versioning. That means:

  • Patch versions (3.1.1 -> 3.1.2) should be safe and bugfix-only.
  • Minor versions (3.1 -> 3.2) may add features but shouldn’t break.
  • Major versions (3.x -> 4.0) can and frequently do introduce breaking changes.

When you use :latest, you’re rolling the dice. You might accidentally jump across major versions without realizing it. And that jump can cost hours—or days—of troubleshooting and fixes during a deployment window.

The better practice: pin your versions​

Instead of :latest, always use an explicit version tag, for example:

FROM node:18.16.1

This way:

  • Builds are deterministic. On any machine, anytime, you’ll get the same image.
  • Deployments are predictable. No silent upgrades will break your services.
  • Maintenance is explicit. When you’re ready to update, you bump the version intentionally, test the changes, and roll them out with confidence.

For internal images, the same principle applies. Tag your own images with version numbers (my-service:3.1.1) rather than treating latest as the only tag. This makes it immediately clear what version is running in production, staging, or development.

Conclusion​

docker pull image:latest feels convenient, but it’s a hidden trap. My team learned this the hard way after spending days firefighting issues that could have been avoided.

Pinning your Docker image versions is a simple step that saves massive amounts of pain. Explicit versioning makes your environment reproducible, your deployments reliable, and your debugging far less stressful.